Prove that:
|
Here is a rather non-rigorous proof of the series you're trying to show. I'll see what I can do to make it better. First of all I'll post the dodgy proof...
See Dan Goodman's message on April 8th in this thread. Here Euler's infinite product
for sin x is given:
sin x = ...(1+x/(3p))(1+x/(2p))(1+x/p)x(1-x/p)(1-x/(2p))(1-x/(3p))...
(actually the x was left out but I'm pretty sure that was a mistake
- it doesn't make sense otherwise). According to the message, this
was guessed by Euler because sin has roots at n*pi.
Now continuing on in the crazy spirit Euler started out in why not
differentiate both sides with respect to x using (and you're going
to love this) the product rule extended to infinite
products. (No doubt this isn't valid - I'll work on this
later.)
In general if y = ab (where y,a,b are functions of x) then:
y' = (a')(b) + (a)(b')
If y = abc then:
y' = (a')(b)(c) + (a)(b')(c) + (a)(b)(c')
So we try to extend this to infinite products. y = abcdef....
y' = (a')bcdef.... + a(b')cdef... + ab(c')def... + ...
Now using Euler's infinite product and applying the difference of
two squares rule, sin x = ...f(-2)f(-1)f(0)f(1)f(2)...
where f(n) = (1-x/n*p) for n¹0, and f(0) = x. Agreed?
Now differentiating both sides of the equation it is easy to
see:
cos x = ... + g(-2) + g(-1) + g(0) + g(1) + g(2) + ...
where g(n) = ...f(n-2)f(n-1)f'(n)f(n+1)f(n+2)...
where f'(n) = derivative of f(n) with respect to x.
But g(n) = ...f(n-1)f(n)f(n+1)... * [f'(n)/f(n)] = sin x *
f'(n)/f(n)
(you simply replace the infinite product with sin x due to Euler's
infinite product formula).
Now for n¹0, f(n) = 1-x/n*pi, so
f'(n)/f(n) = (-1/n*pi)/(1-x/n*pi) = 1/(x-n*pi). And f'(0)/f(0) =
1/x, so in fact f'(n)/f(n) = 1/(x-n*pi) for all n.
Therefore for all n:
g(n) = sin(x)/(x-n*p). And we
know:
cos x = ... + g(-1) + g(0) + g(1) + ...
So:
cos x = ... + sin(x)/(x-p) + sin(x)/(x)
+ sin(x)/(x+p) + ...
Divide through by sin x:
cot x = ... + 1/(x-2*p) +
1/(x-p) + 1/x + 1/(x+p + 1/(x+2*p) + ...
(*)
This is almost the right hand side of your equation but not quite.
We need to make the terms alternate in sign. To do this we first
consider cot(x/2)
cot(x/2) = ... + 1/(x/2-2*p) +
1/(x/2-p) + 1/(x/2) + 1/(x/2+p + 1/(x/2+2*p) +
...
So:
cot(x/2) = ... + 2/(x-2*p) + 2/x +
2/(x-2*p) + ...
Now subtract equation (*):
cot(x/2) - cot(x) = ... - 1/(x-3*p) +
1/(x-2*p) - 1/(x-p + 1/x - 1/(x+p) +
1/(x+2*p) - ...
Now if you combine 1/(x-n*p) and
1/(x+n*p) pairwise you can see that this
is indeed the right hand side. All that remains to be proven is
that:
cot(x/2) - cot(x) = 1/sin(x)
LHS = 1/tan(x/2) - 1/tan(x) = 1/tan(x/2) -
(1-tan2(x/2))/(2tan(x/2)) = 1/2*(tan(x/2) +
cot(x/2))
Multiply the top and bottom of the fraction by
sin(x/2)cos(x/2):
LHS = 1/2*(cos2(x/2) +
sin2(x/2))/(sin(x/2)cos(x/2)) = 1/(2*sin(x/2)*cos(x/2))
= 1/sin x = RHS.
Thus "proving" the equation.
I'd be extremely interested on anybody's ideas on making the middle
part of this a little more rigorous.
Yours,
Michael