Welcome to NRICH.

 
What is ez?


By Anonymous on Friday, September 15, 2000 - 07:27 pm:

Hi
If z is a complex number, what would ez mean?
Thanks


By Michael Doré (P904) on Friday, September 15, 2000 - 09:33 pm:

Well if z = a + bi where a,b are real then we have:

ez = ea × ebi = ea (cos b + i sin b)

because ebi = cos b + i sin b

by Euler's formula. My favourite way of proving Euler's formula is using second order differential equations.

Let f(x) = eax

Easy to see:

f''(x) = a2eax

So:

f''(x) + f(x) = eax [1+a2]

Now let a = i, so that f(x) = eix and a2 = -1. Then:

f''(x) + f(x) = 0.

This is the second order simple harmonic motion differential equation (which is used in analysing springs, for instance). The general solution can be easily shown as:

f(x) = A cos x + B sin x

So:

eix = A cos x + B sin x

where A,B are constant.

Setting x = 0:

e0 = A

So A = 1. Differentiate:

ieix = -A sin x + B cos x

Set x = 0:

i = B. So:

eix = cos x + i sin x

as required.

Yours,

Michael


By Anonymous on Saturday, September 16, 2000 - 02:28 pm:

What would the transfomation of Z going to eZ do to the line of Re(z) = 2 and why?
Plus where on an Argand diagram would ez=0 ?

Thanks for all your help.


By Pras Pathmanathan (Pp233) on Monday, September 18, 2000 - 09:24 pm:

Hi Anon.

The line Re(z)=2 is given by z=2+iy for y real. So ez is:

ez = e2+iy = e2eiy = e2(cos y + isin y)

Since e2 is greater than 0, this is in modulus-argument form, modulus e2 and argument y. y can be any real number, so certainly any possible argument is possible, so Re(z) maps to the set of points of modulus e2, ie the circle of radius e2 (and centre 0).

As for your second question, there isn't any complex number z such that ez = 0. For suppose there was, and write z as z=x+iy, where x and y are real. Then:

0 = ez = ex(cosy+isiny) = excosy + iexsiny

Equating real and imaginary parts gives

excosy = 0
exsiny = 0 where x,y are real

cos y and sin y are never both zero, so we must have ex=0. But x is real, and we know that ex > 0 for real x, so no such z is possible.

Pras


By Tim Garton (P2843) on Tuesday, September 19, 2000 - 07:55 pm:

Thank you