Hard integrals, and strategies for
integration
By Rupert on June 3, 1998:
Hiya please send me the hardest integral that you can think
of
thanx
By Gordon Lee (gtyl2) on June 3,
1998:
Rupert,
I think that whether an integral is hard is very subjective and
that most of the time. If you are trying to integrate an expression
because you need it to solve your problem, most of the time, you
won't be able to do the integrating analytically! There is a branch
of Mathematics call Numerical Analysis and it deals with computing
often non-analytical (ie. you can't integrate!) problems
numerically!
I will give you an example of something you can't integrate:
sin(x)/x
I will probably send you a few more later.
Gordon
By Gordon Lee (gtyl2) on June 4,
1998:
As promised more problematic
integrals:
e-x2 - the exp part of the pgf of the normal
distribution
1/(cos x - c)1/2 - arises in calculating the time period
of a pendulum
Gordon
By Demetris Andreou Demetriou (dad20) on
June 12, 1998:
Health Warning: The following discussion
(and examples) are appropriate for people at the end of their first
year in A-Level Math or equivalent.
The difficulty of a specific integral is very ambiguous and depends
on the techniques one has at hand, as well as wether the object is
simply to carry out the integration, or carry out the integration
using a certain technique. To the extend of the material covered in
A-level math the object is to carry out the integral. There are
many elementary tricks/techniques that allow one to tackle
integrals that at first sight might seem impossible to do. These
include
- inspection,
- substitutions,
- partial fractions,
- integration by parts,
- use of standard results, e.g. another
integral or series.
The following examples illustrate some of the above
techniques.
Example 1 ((inspection, substitution))
a)
ò(2x+3)/(x2+3x-2)dx ,
b)
ò0
11/((4-x)(x-1)½)dx
Example 2 ((by parts))
a)
òe-xcos(x)dx , b)
òx2exdx
Example 3 ((substitution, partial fractions))
ò(cos(x))/(3+cos(x))dx
(difficult)
Example 4 ((inspection,by parts ))
ò0
x
e-x2/(x
2+½)
2
dx
(Very difficult). Your answer should include
ò0 x
e-x2dx left as it is. This can not be evaluated
for general x in terms of elementary functions.
Example 5
ò-¥ ¥ e-x2 dx
(Impossible or not !!!)
Let
I = ò-¥ ¥ e-x2 dx
To evaluate it we are going to employ in a clever way some of the
properties of the exponential function. One can equally write the
above in terms of a different variable of integration
I = ò-¥ ¥ e-z2 dz
Multiplying the two expressions for I we obtain
I2 = ò-¥ ¥ e-x2 dx
ò-¥
¥
e
-z2 dz
=
ò-¥
¥
ò-¥
¥
e
-x2 e
-z2 dx dz
=
ò-¥
¥
ò-¥
¥
e
-(x2+z
2) dx dz
which is a double integral extending over the xz plane. Consider
then expressing the integration over this plane in terms of polar
coordinates, r and
q, i.e.
x
2+z
2=r
2
and
dxdz = rdrd
q
and complete the evaluation. If all goes well you should find
that
|2{I =
p½}
Example 6
ò0
¥
x3/(ex-1) dx
Only for people doing further Maths, or special papers)
The following is not the most elegant way of evaluating the above
integral, BUT it does not require anything more than knowledge of
SERIES EXPANSIONS, and the standard result, (assumed to be given)
that
S¥ n=1 1/n4 = p4/90
Let
I = ò0
¥
x3/(ex-1) dx
and noting that since e
-x<=1, then throughout the
range of integration we can Taylor expand, and so
x3/(ex-1) =
e-xx3(1/(1-e-x))(1 +
e-x + e-2x + ...)
Can you prove the above ? Consider expanding in a series
(1-e
-x)
-1. What happens if you move
e
-x into the brackets? Can you see how the summation
result quoted above can be of any use? If all goes well you should
find that
I = p4/15
Example 6
Without carrying out the integration, use your answer in the
previous example to show that
ò0
¥
x3/(ex+1) dx = 7/8.p4/15
-------------------------------
Demetris Andreou Demetriou