This query refers to a question set several years ago in the
Spanish Universities entrance examination (`selectividad') which
translated reads as follows:
Find the point on the graph of the function y=x2-1 that
is closest to the point (2,-1).
It appears to be a fairly straightforward case of minimising a
general formula for distance between the given point and the given
graph but this leads to having to solve a cubic equation which
cannot be solved by normal `A level' methods. This leads us to
suspect that there may be an error in the choice of function or
co-ordinates. Do you agree or are we missing something obvious?
It's not nice, is it? I get 2x3+x-2=0 from your
suggested distance minimisation and have verified this by finding
the normal to the curve.
You could always quote the result by Cardon -- maybe this is on
their syllabus. One of my A-level teachers wrote it on the board to
get himself out of a similar problem but I haven't seen it since.
Took a bit of finding, too :-)
General solution to x3+px=q
x= cubert( sqrt((q/2)2+(p/3)3) + (q/2)
)
-cubert( sqrt((q/2)2+(p/3)3) - (q/2) )
which, for p=1/2, q=1, gives:
x=cubert(sqrt(330)/36 + 1/2)-cubert(sqrt(330)/36 - 1/2)
However, quoting a result isn't terribly taxing; on the other hand,
if the question was wrong and it /was/ solvable by A-level
means.... that wouldn't be terribly taxing either.
There is also a method of solving such things using a sin
substitution and De Moivre to express sin3 x in terms of sin 3x but
I'm afraid I'm not familiar with it. I also don't under what
conditions Cardon holds or how it stands up to equations with three
solutions instead of just one; applying it to x3-7x=-6
(solutions 1,2,-3) gives a complex cube root of one.
Hope this helps (in some small way, at least!)
Rup.